non-diatonic chord progression ?

Well who doesn't have a question about theory? Come on in and get them answered here. Beginning to advanced theory questions are welcome.
Post Reply
stskhk
newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: March 27th, 2011, 5:27 pm

non-diatonic chord progression ?

Post by stskhk » March 27th, 2011, 5:32 pm

Hi Guitar Noise Friends, I found a sound-great chord progression which is

Fm //// C //// Db //// C ////
Fm //// Bb //// Eb //// Fm ////
Fm //// C //// Db // C // Fm ////

I guess it's Roman Numerals are the followings.
VI- III IV III
VI- II V VI-
VI- III IV III VI-

This is not a diatonic chord progression, and seems to come from some Modal Interchanges. Would anybody explain about this, and please give me some ‘secret' of making this kind of non-diatonic chord progression ?

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
NoteBoat
Musically Insane
Posts: 5694
Joined: August 9th, 2003, 8:48 pm
Location: SW of Chicago
Contact:

Re: non-diatonic chord progression ?

Post by NoteBoat » March 27th, 2011, 7:37 pm

A few general observations before my analysis:

First, If a chord progression is truly non-diatonic, Roman numerals are of no use. That's not important here, because it IS a diatonic progression, as you'll see below.

Second, any Roman numeral analysis of a chord progression that doesn't include "I" is almost always wrong. If you've got a progression, you' should have a tonal center. Here it's pretty clearly Fm - it is the first chord, the last chord, the most frequently used chord, and the closing chord of a V-i cadence at the end.

Third, minor key chord progressions will often have chords that look like they're outside the key. But that's often because you're thinking in terms of major chord progressions... there's only one major scale available in any key, but there are lots of minor scales, which lead to lots more possibilities for a harmony.

Now my analysis:

It's usually helpful to start by writing out the notes of the chords. You've got Fm (F-Ab-C), C (C-E-G), Db (Db-F-Ab), Bb (Bb-D-F), and Eb (Eb-G-Bb).

It's reasonable to assume Fm is your key, for the reasons I stated above. So let's line up all the notes used in the chords starting with F:

F-G-Ab-Bb-C-Db-D-Eb-E

Now let's compare that to the F melodic minor scale:

F-G-Ab-Bb-C-D-E-F (ascending) F-Eb-Db-C-Bb-Ab-G-A (descending)

Every chord tone is represented in the scale. So my first conclusion is that this IS a diatonic progression, and you're clearly in F minor. Now we can apply the Roman numerals:

i - V - bvi - V
i- IV - bVII - i
i - V - bvi - V - i

This makes sense. The first line ends in V - that's called a half cadence. A bvi-V in a minor key is called a Phrygian half cadence. It would be more typical to see v (Cm) or bVII (Eb) as the second chord - that would make things a bit more interesting - but

The second line has IV moving to bVII. A more typical use would be Bbm as the second chord - that's common enough to have its own name (the "backdoor cadence"). But using the melodic minor scale, IV still fits.

The third line is just that Phrygian half cadence again from the first line, but brought to a close with an authentic cadence (V-I) at the end of the line.
Guitar teacher offering lessons in Plainfield IL

stskhk
newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: March 27th, 2011, 5:27 pm

Re: non-diatonic chord progression ?

Post by stskhk » March 28th, 2011, 3:50 am

Hi NoteBoat- Thank you so~~ much for your kind, great and clear explanation. It's very interesting to know Phrygian half cadence and backdoor cadence too. :D

Post Reply